Redirected: Conscious Intervention at Decision Points and the Divergence of Human Trajectories

Redirected: Why I’m Writing a PhD About the Moment Everything Changes

By Alexander Peter Sully | June 2026

-----

Most people don’t expect a man who spent his first year in Portugal living in a tent to end up submitting a doctoral thesis to a Lisbon university.

Neither did I.

But seven years of living off-grid, coaching people through radical life transitions, and watching 152,000 people in an online community all grappling with the same terrifying decision — whether to leave their old life behind or stay trapped inside it — has a way of accumulating into something. A body of evidence. A framework. A theory.

This is that theory. And this is the proposal.

-----

The Title

Redirected: Conscious Intervention at Decision Points and the Divergence of Human Trajectories Across Individual, Community, and Civilisational Scales

An Auto-Ethnographic and Counterfactual Study

Field: Sociology and Social Anthropology.

-----

What This Research Is About

Here is the central argument — stated plainly.

Human beings accumulate vast pattern data across a lifetime. Every failed relationship, every wrong turn, every moment something felt off — it leaves a signature. We are, in fact, extraordinary pattern recognition machines.

But at the critical moments of decision — precisely when that data is most needed — we cannot access it clearly.

Emotional embeddedness blocks it. Identity investment distorts it. Narrative capture filters it. Momentum makes reversal feel impossible before we’ve even consciously registered what is happening.

This is not weakness. It is not stupidity. **It is a structural feature of embedded consciousness. We cannot see a painting clearly from inside it.

And this — not lack of intelligence, not lack of opportunity, not bad luck — is the primary driver of individual lives going wrong. Of communities failing to support their most vulnerable members. Of civilisations repeating destructive cycles generation after generation despite having all the historical data they need to see what is coming.

The mechanism is the same at every scale.

Pattern blindness. And the conscious intervention — rare, precise, positioned from outside the emotional field — that breaks it.

-----

The Framework: CIDP

I am calling this framework Conscious Intervention at Decision Points — CIDP.

The proposition is this.

At every critical juncture in a human life, there is a window. Before that window closes, the trajectory can still be changed. After it closes, momentum has built to the point where reversal becomes exponentially more difficult.

Within that window, a skilled observer positioned outside the subject’s emotional field can introduce pattern-informed perspective in a way that restores access to occluded data — and creates the conditions for genuine divergence from the predicted path.

Not advice. Not instruction. A structurally different perspective, delivered at the exact moment it can still land.

This is what effective coaching actually is. Not the delivery of wisdom. The restoration of the client’s access to their own.

The framework operates at three scales:

Individual — one person, one decision point, one intervention, one divergent life. This is the scale of the Wayfinder coaching practice.

Community — 152,000 people at various stages of the same transition, with those further along functioning as outside mirrors for those still approaching the decision point. This is the Off Grid Portugal community as a distributed intervention system.

Civilisational — historian and complexity scientist Peter Turchin has shown mathematically that human societies repeat cycles of instability and conflict roughly every fifty years. Not because they lack the data. Because each generation experiences their moment as unprecedented, preventing the application of available pattern recognition to the current trajectory. The same mechanism. A vastly larger scale.

-----

Why Auto-Ethnography

The governing methodology of this research is auto-ethnography — the use of the researcher’s own lived experience as primary data.

This is not self-indulgence. It is epistemological precision.

The argument of the thesis is that pattern recognition requires embeddedness to accumulate data, and distance to apply it clearly. The auto-ethnographic researcher occupies both positions simultaneously — living the experience and analysing it from outside.

The methodology enacts the theory.

My own life is the primary data set. Seven years progressing from a tent in the Portuguese forest to a restored nineteenth-century stone house on the Rio Águeda. A coaching practice. Two BBC television appearances in 42 countries. A community of 152,000 people. A memoir in progress. A senior retail career left behind.

All of it research. All of it evidence.

-----

The Counterfactual Method

Every case study in this thesis is examined through three lenses.

The pre-intervention trajectory — the path that was unfolding. What the pattern data predicted. What almost certainly would have happened.

The intervention — what was said, by whom, from what position outside the emotional field, at what precise moment, through what mechanism.

The post-intervention divergence — what actually unfolded. The measurable difference between the two trajectories.

That difference is not incidental. It is the empirical evidence for CIDP.

This structure is applied consistently across individual coaching case studies, community dynamics, and selected historical civilisational examples. The consistency of the analytical structure across scales is itself an argument for the universality of the underlying mechanism.

The Twelve Chapters

Chapter 1 — The Problem of the Unlived Life

Most people are not living a life they chose. They are living a life that accumulated — decision by default, compromise by compromise, until one day they look up and realise the life they are inside belongs to someone else entirely.

This chapter opens the thesis with that moment of recognition. Not a crisis. A clarity. The quiet, devastating realisation that the painting you are standing inside is not one you would have chosen from the outside.

It establishes the central argument: that the primary obstacle to a fully lived life is not lack of courage, intelligence, or opportunity. It is the structural inability of a consciousness embedded in its own experience to see clearly what it is doing and where it is going.

It introduces the CIDP framework, the counterfactual methodology, and the research questions. It explains why this research is situated in sociology and social anthropology rather than pure psychology — because the problem is not individual pathology. It is a structural feature of how human beings exist inside their own lives.

Conclusion of Chapter 1: The unlived life is not a personal failure. It is a predictable outcome of a structural problem that can be identified, named, and — with the right intervention at the right moment — interrupted.

-----

Chapter 2 — Literature Review: What We Already Know and What Is Missing

Seven bodies of existing scholarship are relevant to this research. Each illuminates a part of the problem. None of them joins the parts together.

Voluntary simplicity and neo-rural migration — the sociology of people who choose to leave mainstream life (Elgin, 1981; Halfacree, 2006). This literature documents the demographics and motivations of people like those in the Off Grid Portugal community but does not examine the mechanisms of successful transition or the role of intervention.

Transformative learning theory — Mezirow’s (1991) framework for how adults change fundamental assumptions about themselves and the world. Mezirow locates the catalyst for transformation in internal “disorienting dilemmas.” This thesis argues the catalyst is more reliably external — a skilled outside perspective at the right moment.

Cognitive and behavioural psychology — Kahneman’s (2011) work on System 1 and System 2 thinking provides the neurological basis for pattern blindness. The emotional brain overrides the analytical brain at precisely the moments of highest stakes.

Complexity theory— the study of how small inputs at critical nodes in complex systems generate disproportionate effects (Stacey, 2001; Snowden & Boone, 2007). This provides the theoretical basis for the CIDP claim that a precisely timed intervention can redirect a trajectory that appears to have its own momentum.

Narrative identity theory — McAdams’ (1993) work on how people construct and maintain coherent life stories. Narrative capture — the way an established story filters out contradicting information — is one of the five mechanisms of pattern blindness this thesis identifies.

Coaching psychology — the growing academic literature on what makes coaching effective. This thesis argues that existing coaching psychology has not adequately theorised the structural position of the coach as outside observer, or the timing dimension of effective intervention.

Cliodynamics — Turchin’s (2003; 2023) mathematical modelling of historical cycles of civilisational instability. Provides the macro-level theoretical context for Chapter 9.

Conclusion of Chapter 2: The gap this thesis fills is precise. No existing framework unifies these insights across all three scales — individual, community, civilisational — under a single explanatory mechanism, proposes a replicable intervention methodology grounded in that mechanism, or grounds the theory in a sustained auto-ethnographic evidence base of this scope and duration.

-----

Chapter 3 — Methodology: Living as Research

Auto-ethnography is the use of the researcher’s own lived experience as primary data. It is an established and respected methodology in sociology and social anthropology, developed most fully by Ellis, Adams, and Bochner (2011) and Chang (2008).

It is the right methodology for this research for a specific reason beyond convenience.

The central argument of the thesis is that pattern recognition requires embeddedness to accumulate data and distance to apply it clearly. The auto-ethnographic researcher is precisely the person who has lived inside the experience — accumulating the data — and then stepped outside it analytically to see what the pattern shows. The methodology enacts the theory it is investigating.

This chapter defends that choice rigorously. It addresses the standard objections to auto-ethnography — subjectivity, reliability, generalisability — and explains why, in the context of this specific research question, these objections are less decisive than they appear.

It establishes the counterfactual analytical structure as a formal methodology. It explains how the three-column framework — pre-intervention trajectory, intervention, post-intervention divergence — is applied consistently across all case studies regardless of scale.

It addresses ethical considerations: the anonymisation of coaching clients, the treatment of community data, the responsibilities of a researcher who is simultaneously a practitioner within the field being studied.

Conclusion of Chapter 3: The choice of auto-ethnography is not a methodological convenience. It is a theoretical commitment. And the counterfactual structure transforms what could be subjective personal narrative into falsifiable empirical analysis.

-----

Chapter 4 — The Unlived Life: Origins of Radical Reinvention

This is where the research begins in earnest. My own story.

Not as memoir — though the memoir manuscript, The Wylde Path, is the primary research artefact of this thesis. As auto-ethnographic data, examined through the analytical framework established in Chapter 3.

The pre-intervention trajectory: a senior retail career, scaling a business from three to over 120 stores as Head of Retail, Birmingham. By any external measure — income, status, professional achievement — a successful life. And from the inside, the accumulation of red flags that a pattern-literate observer could have identified years before I could see them myself. The misalignment between the life being performed and the life that wanted to be lived.

The decision point: not a single dramatic moment but a threshold, crossed in 2019, after which the trajectory became genuinely irreversible.

The move to Portugal. The tent. The beginning.

This chapter applies full counterfactual analysis to my own trajectory. The pre-intervention path — continuation of the retail career to its probable conclusion — is mapped against the post-intervention reality. The divergence between them is the first empirical evidence for CIDP in this thesis. Not because I intervened in my own life from outside. But because something did — a series of internal and external pressures that eventually functioned as the structural equivalent of outside perspective.

Conclusion of Chapter 4: The unlived life is not invisible from the outside. It has a recognisable pattern signature. And the decision point — the moment at which it can still be changed — is earlier than most people realise.

-----

Chapter 5 — Building from Nothing: The Mechanics of Transition

Leaving is not the hard part. What comes after is.

This chapter follows the trajectory through its most vulnerable phase — the period after the initial decision when the old life has been left and the new one has not yet been built. The period when most radical reinventions fail. When people return to what they left, not because they wanted to, but because the gap between the decision and the destination became unbearable.

Tents. Caravans. The slow, physical, unglamorous reality of building a life from nothing in rural Portugal. The restoration of the stone house on the Rio Águeda. The first winter. The moments when the trajectory came closest to reversing.

This chapter maps not one decision point but many — the series of smaller junctures at which the trajectory could have bent back toward the old life, and the interventions, internal and external, that maintained forward momentum through each of them.

It examines the psychological architecture of sustained transition: what makes it survivable, what the early warning signs of collapse look like, and what the structural conditions are that allow people to hold a new direction long enough for it to become irreversible.

Conclusion of Chapter 5: Radical reinvention is not a single decision. It is a sustained series of decisions, each one a potential reversal point. The mechanisms of CIDP operate not once but repeatedly throughout the transition — and the absence of outside support at any of these points can undo what the initial intervention made possible.

-----

Chapter 6 — Conscious Intervention at Decision Points: The CIDP Framework

The theoretical heart of the thesis.

This chapter develops the CIDP framework in full across its three propositions, drawing on the evidence of the preceding chapters, the coaching case studies that follow, and the theoretical synthesis established in the literature review.

The five mechanisms of pattern blindness are examined in depth:

Emotional hijacking — when desire, fear, or grief is present at the moment of decision, the limbic system narrows the cognitive field. Pattern data that would be visible in a calm analytical state becomes inaccessible. This is not a malfunction. It is the brain doing exactly what it evolved to do — prioritising felt experience over abstract analysis. The problem is that this mechanism fires at the moments of highest stakes.

Identity investment — when a decision has become constitutive of who you believe yourself to be, seeing it clearly becomes psychologically threatening. To recognise the pattern would require confronting truths about yourself that the ego actively resists. The investment in the story of the decision overrides the ability to evaluate the decision itself.

Narrative capture — once a story has been constructed around a choice — “this is my legacy,” “this is what I was always meant to do,” “this is my last chance” — incoming information is processed through that narrative. Data that confirms it is amplified. Data that contradicts it is discarded or rationalised away. The story becomes more real than the facts.

Proximity blindness — the same person who can see instantly what is wrong with a friend’s situation cannot see the equivalent pattern in their own. The structural difference is position, not intelligence. You are inside your own painting. You are outside theirs.

Momentum and sunk cost — as time passes and investment accumulates — emotional, financial, social — the perceived cost of reversal grows until continuation feels inevitable. The question stops being “is this the right path?” and becomes “how could I possibly stop now?”

The primary case study — a detailed coaching intervention with full counterfactual analysis — is presented here. The pre-intervention trajectory mapped in detail. The intervention documented. The post-intervention divergence measured. This is the empirical core of the CIDP claim.

The openness prerequisite is established as the single most important variable in the effectiveness of any intervention. The most skilled outside observer, arriving at the most precisely identified decision point, cannot redirect a trajectory if the subject is not — at some level, consciously or not — willing to be seen clearly. This openness can be cultivated. It can also be destroyed by trauma, ego, and cultural conditioning that treats asking for outside perspective as weakness rather than wisdom.

Conclusion of Chapter 6: CIDP is not a technique. It is a structural account of why human trajectories go the way they do — and why, at specific identifiable moments, they can still be changed. The five mechanisms of pattern blindness are universal. The intervention methodology is replicable. The openness prerequisite is the human variable that determines whether the mechanism fires or fails.

-----

Chapter 7 — The Community: 152,000 People at the Decision Point

The Off Grid Portugal community did not begin as a research project. It became one.

152,000 people, most of them at some stage of the same fundamental transition — from a mainstream life that no longer fits to an alternative one they can barely picture yet. Asking the same questions. Revealing the same patterns. Demonstrating, collectively and repeatedly, the mechanisms of pattern blindness and the conditions under which outside perspective changes what they choose.

This chapter analyses the community as a meso-scale evidence base for CIDP.

Thematic analysis of community discourse reveals consistent patterns: the questions people ask at the decision point (“is it realistic?”, “have I left it too late?”, “what if it doesn’t work?”), the red flags that signal a poorly prepared transition, the recurring signatures of both failure and success, and — most strikingly — the moments when a single comment from someone further along the trajectory visibly changes what a person decides to do.

The digital/physical paradox is examined in depth: a community of people who want to leave digital noise behind, built and sustained entirely through digital infrastructure. This contradiction is not a problem to be resolved. It is one of the most interesting findings of the research. The digital community functions as the support architecture that makes physical disconnection possible — a distributed intervention system that provides the outside perspective that people cannot generate alone.

This chapter also examines what the community reveals about the limits of CIDP at community scale: the cases where intervention did not land, where the pattern blindness mechanisms proved too strong, where people proceeded despite clear outside signals and experienced the trajectory the data predicted.

Conclusion of Chapter 7: A community of people navigating the same transition is not just a support group. It is a living pattern library. And when it is structured well — with diverse perspectives, cross-stage membership, and genuine mutual investment — it functions as a distributed intervention mechanism of measurable effectiveness.

-----

Chapter 8 — Coaching as Applied CIDP: The Wayfinder Practice

If Chapter 6 is the theory of CIDP, Chapter 8 is its practice manual.

The Wayfinder coaching practice has worked with clients across a wide range of major life transitions: career exits, relationship endings, geographic relocations, identity reconstructions. Each one a decision point. Each one a potential site of intervention.

This chapter presents anonymised case studies — each structured through the three-column counterfactual framework — to examine what effective CIDP looks like in practice. What the pre-intervention trajectory reveals. What the intervention actually consists of — the specific questions, the timing, the structural position of the coach outside the client’s emotional field. And what the post-intervention divergence demonstrates about whether and how the mechanism worked.

It examines what CBT, NLP, and life coaching have in common when viewed through the CIDP lens: all three, at their most effective, are methods for temporarily restoring the client’s access to their own occluded pattern recognition from a structurally different position.

It addresses the hardest questions in coaching practice. When not to intervene — the cases where the trajectory, while painful, is the one the person needs to complete. The ethics of standing outside someone’s painting and offering a view they did not ask for. The difference between genuine outside perspective and the imposition of the coach’s own patterns onto the client’s situation.

And it examines the cases that did not work — the clients for whom the intervention did not land, where the openness prerequisite was absent, and what those cases reveal about the limits of CIDP as a methodology.

Conclusion of Chapter 8:Coaching is most effective when it is understood not as the delivery of wisdom but as the structural provision of outside perspective at a precisely identified moment. The coach’s value is not their knowledge. It is their position.

-----

Chapter 9 — The Macro Pattern: Wars, Civilisations, and the Cycle Nobody Interrupts

This is the most ambitious chapter in the thesis — and the most honest about its own limitations.

Peter Turchin’s cliodynamics demonstrates that human societies repeat cycles of elite overproduction, popular immiseration, state fragility, and violent conflict with mathematical regularity. The data spans centuries and crosses cultures. The pattern is not accidental. It is structural.

What existing cliodynamics scholarship does not fully address is the mechanism by which the pattern persists despite the availability of historical data. Societies have archives. They have historians. They have, in principle, everything they need to recognise what is happening and choose differently.

They do not choose differently. They repeat.

This chapter applies the CIDP framework to that question. The argument is that the same mechanisms that prevent an individual from seeing their own pattern — emotional embeddedness in the current moment, identity investment in the current order, narrative capture by the current story of national or civilisational exceptionalism, the momentum of existing institutions — operate at civilisational scale with equivalent force and equivalent blindness.

Each generation experiences their crisis as structurally unprecedented. The data says otherwise. But the data is in the past. The crisis is now. And the now always feels different from inside it.

The chapter then examines the rare historical cases where something functioning as conscious intervention at a civilisational decision point successfully redirected the trajectory — moments where an outside perspective, introduced at the critical juncture, changed what a society chose. These cases are few. They are instructive.

This chapter is presented explicitly as speculative theoretical contribution rather than settled empirical claim. The evidence base at this scale is necessarily different from the individual and community scales. The argument is offered as a proposition warranting dedicated future research — not as a conclusion this thesis can fully substantiate.

Conclusion of Chapter 9: The mechanisms of pattern blindness are not uniquely individual. They operate wherever consciousness becomes embedded in its own moment and loses access to the wider pattern. At civilisational scale, the consequences of that blindness are catastrophic. The implication — that conscious intervention at identifiable decision points might redirect civilisational trajectories as it redirects individual ones — is the most important and most uncertain claim this thesis makes.

-----

Chapter 10 — The Television Mirror: Being Observed While Transforming

In the course of this research, something unusual happened.

A BBC film crew arrived at the property and documented the life that was, by then, several years into its reinvented form. The resulting episodes of New Lives in the Wild were broadcast in forty-two countries.

The experience of being filmed — of having your life observed, edited, and reflected back to a mass audience — is itself a form of outside perspective. And what the audience response revealed was striking: not curiosity about the practical details of off-grid living, but recognition. The sense that something in the life being observed named something in the lives of those observing it.

This chapter examines that response through the CIDP framework. The film functioned as a macro-scale intervention — introducing an outside perspective on a life trajectory to an audience of people who were, in many cases, at their own decision points. The volume and nature of the messages received after broadcast are themselves data: evidence of how widespread the experience of pattern blindness is, how many people are living inside paintings they cannot fully see, and how powerful the effect of outside perspective can be even at the mediated distance of a television screen.

It also examines the observer effect on the candidate’s own trajectory. Being filmed — being required to articulate, in real time, why you are living the way you are living — is a form of forced outside perspective on your own choices. The camera functions as a mirror positioned outside the emotional field.

Conclusion of Chapter 10: Being seen — genuinely, clearly, from outside your own narrative — is one of the most powerful interventions available to a human being. The scale at which that seeing happened through the television broadcast revealed something important: the longing for this kind of outside perspective is not rare. It is nearly universal.

-----

Chapter 11 — Discussion: What This All Means

All twelve chapters converge here.

The CIDP framework has been developed theoretically, demonstrated empirically at individual and community scale, and proposed speculatively at civilisational scale. The counterfactual methodology has been applied consistently across all cases. The auto-ethnographic evidence base has provided the grounding that makes the theoretical claims more than philosophical propositions.

What does it all mean?

For coaching practice: if the CIDP framework is correct, the most important variable in effective coaching is not the coach’s methodology — it is their structural position outside the client’s emotional field, and the precision of their timing. Coaching that arrives too early, before momentum has built, will not land. Coaching that arrives too late, after momentum has made reversal feel impossible, will not land. The skill is in reading the decision point accurately.

For community design: communities that structurally embed outside perspective — through cross-stage membership, diverse backgrounds, and genuine investment in each other’s trajectories — are not just supportive. They are interventional. The Off Grid Portugal community demonstrates that this kind of distributed intervention system can operate at scale without centralised coordination, simply through the structural arrangement of people at different stages of the same transition.

For education: if pattern blindness is a structural feature of embedded consciousness, then one of the most important skills a person can develop is the ability to temporarily step outside their own emotional field — to read their own situation with the same clarity they would bring to someone else’s. This is a learnable skill. It is almost nowhere taught explicitly.

For governance and collective decision-making:this is the most speculative implication and the one most in need of future research. If civilisational pattern blindness operates through the same mechanisms as individual pattern blindness, then the structural provision of outside perspective in collective decision-making processes — citizens’ assemblies, independent oversight bodies, cross-cultural advisory structures — is not just procedurally useful. It is structurally necessary for societies that want to avoid repeating their own worst patterns.

The limitations of this research are addressed honestly. The auto-ethnographic method carries inherent subjectivity that no analytical framework fully resolves. The counterfactual method cannot establish certainty about what would have happened — only probability. The civilisational scale claims are theoretical propositions, not demonstrated conclusions. The sample of coaching case studies, while genuine, is not a controlled experiment.

Conclusion of Chapter 11: These limitations do not invalidate the framework. They define its current boundaries and identify the directions in which future research should travel. CIDP is a beginning, not a conclusion. A framework offered for testing, refinement, and extension — not a finished edifice.

-----

Chapter 12 — Conclusion: Redirected

The thesis ends where it began.

A single human being at a moment of critical decision. Unable to see clearly from inside the situation. The trajectory unfolding toward a predictable outcome. The pattern data available but inaccessible.

And then — an outside perspective. Arriving at the right moment. Introducing the right information. Not solving the problem. Not making the decision. Simply offering a view of the painting from outside it.

And everything diverging from there.

This chapter does not summarise. It synthesises. It asks what becomes possible — for individuals, communities, and societies — if the structural necessity of outside perspective is taken seriously. If the conditions for genuine intervention are built into the architecture of how we live, how we organise ourselves, how we make decisions.

It acknowledges what the research has not resolved. The openness prerequisite — the willingness to be seen — remains the deepest and most uncertain variable in the framework. You can position a skilled observer at a precisely identified decision point and deliver pattern-informed perspective at exactly the right moment. And if the person is not willing to be seen, the intervention will not reach them.

What cultivates that openness? What destroys it? That is the question this research leaves most fully open.

And it ends with an invitation.

Not to the academic examiner. To the reader.

To anyone who has ever stood at a decision point and wished, in retrospect, that someone outside the situation had offered a clearer view.

To anyone who is standing at one now.

The painting you are inside has a shape that is visible from the outside. The trajectory you are on has a destination that can be read from the pattern data. The decision point — the window during which the trajectory can still be changed — is open for a limited time.

This research is an argument that what happens in that window matters enormously.

And that the person who arrives in that window, positioned outside your emotional field, seeing what you cannot see from inside it — that person is doing something that is not incidental to human flourishing.

It is structural to it.

Final conclusion of the thesis: Pattern blindness is not a personal failing. Conscious intervention is not a luxury. And the divergence between the life that almost happened and the life that actually did — that divergence, accumulated across millions of decision points, across individuals and communities and civilisations — is the difference between a world that repeats its worst patterns and one that learns, incrementally, to interrupt them.

That is what is at stake in the window.

That is what this research is about.

-----

What Makes This Original

The components of this framework exist in scattered form across multiple disciplines.

Kahneman identified the mechanism by which emotional cognition overrides rational pattern recognition. Mezirow identified transformative learning but located its catalyst in internal crisis rather than external intervention. Turchin modelled civilisational cycles mathematically but did not connect them to individual or community level mechanisms.

No existing framework unifies these insights across all three scales under a single explanatory mechanism, proposes a replicable intervention methodology, and grounds the theory in a sustained auto-ethnographic evidence base of this scope and duration.

That is what this research does.

The Candidate

Alexander Peter Sully. British-German dual national. Resident in Mosteirinho, central Portugal since 2019.

Diplomas in CBT, NLP, and Life Coaching. Founder of WyldeRoots. Resident expert contributor to Off Grid Portugal (152,000 members). Operator of WyldeRoots River House, top 5% on Airbnb. Two appearances on BBC New Lives in the Wild, broadcast in 42 countries. Internationally published photographer. Former Head of Retail who scaled a business from 3 to 120+ stores.

No Master’s degree. Applying on the basis of professional expertise, documented original practice, and the originality of the research position.

-----

A Note to Anyone Reading This

If you have found this page, you are probably someone who knows what it is to stand at a decision point and not be able to see the trajectory clearly from inside it.

Maybe you made it through. Maybe you didn’t. Maybe you are standing there right now.

That experience — that precise, universal, structurally inevitable human experience — is what this research is about.

And if it resonates, I would genuinely like to hear from you.

-----

[Work with Alex →](https://www.wylderoots.org/service-page/one-to-one-consultation)*

[About WyldeRoots →](https://www.wylderoots.org/about)*

-----

Tags:PhD research, CIDP, conscious intervention, decision points, life reinvention, pattern recognition, off-grid Portugal, Wayfinder coaching, Redirected, auto-ethnography, counterfactual analysis, Universidade Católica Portuguesa